USPTO serial 75438905
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION, AND ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING BUSINESS CONFERENCES WHICH ASSIST CALIFORNIA COMPANIES IN FINDING BUSINESS PARTNERS, ACCESSING RESOURCES, AND EXPANDING INTO NEW REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 23, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |