USPTO serial 75439075
ECO-LOGICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-LOGICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN NATH & ASSOC1030 15TH ST NW 6TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ENERGY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF ELECTRIC GENERATORS FOR POWER GENERATION; REHABILITATION SYSTEMS OF ENERGY SYSTEMS, ALL INCORPORATING MACHINES, ENGINES, TURBINES, BOILERS (EXCEPT FOR LAND VEHICLES) AND GENERATORS OF ELECTRICITY; POWER PLANTS GENERATING ELECTRICITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC APPARATUS; REHABILITATION SYSTEMS FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS, ALL INCORPORATING COMPUTER PROGRAMS (RECORDED PROGRAMS) | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | REHABILITATION SYSTEMS OF ENERGY SYSTEMS, ALL INCORPORATING HEATING BOILERS AND HEATERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |