USPTO serial 75439365
EPICYCLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPICYCLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hacienda Heights, CA
Hacienda Heights, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Chemical vapor deposition system for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, namely, an electrothermic apparatus that produces coating by reacting vapor-phase chemicals; physical vapor deposition system for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, namely, an electrothermic apparatus that produces coating by vaporizing coating materials; rapid thermal processing system for use in the manufacture of semiconductors, namely, an electrothermic apparatus that subjects an item under treatment to rapidly varying thermal conditions; fittings and parts to be used in conjunction with the listed apparatus; semiconductors produced, coated, processed, or treated by the listed apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |