USPTO serial 75439431
ADVANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHATTI, FARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FIN-20101 Turku, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADRIENNE L WHITE
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE; ANALYTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE; BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, ANTIBODIES, TISSUES, CELLS, CELL LINES, PROTEINS, PEPTIDES AND NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES, FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; RESEARCH CARRIED OUT IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL OR BIOTECHNICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH, NAMELY, PHARMACEUTICAL SCREENING ASSAYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |