USPTO serial 75439977
BLOOMING POPCORN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLOOMING POPCORN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FOOD PRODUCTS,NAMELY, POPPED POPCORN; COATED POPPED POPCORN; COATED FLAVORED POPPED POPCORN; POPPED POPCORN ARRANGEMENTS; POPPED POPCORN ARRANGEMENTS SIMULATING FLOWERS; GIFT ITEMS SIMULATING FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS CREATED FROM POPPED POPCORN; GIFTS ITEMS SIMULATING FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POPPED POPCORN ON STEMS; GIFT ITEMS SIMULATING FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POPPED POPCORN IN GIFT BASKETS; GIFT ITEMS SIMULATING FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POPPED POPCORN ARRANGED IN POTTERY; GIFT ITEMS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF POPPED POPCORN ALSO INCLUDING FLOWERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS, FOOD PRODUCTS AND OTHER GIFT PRODUCTS IN THE NATURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS SIMULATING FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING GIFT BASKETS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF POPCORN; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING GIFT BASKETS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING GIFT BOXES COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF POPCORN; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING GIFT BASKETS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF POPCORN DISPLAYED TO SIMULATE FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS; ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING GIFT ITEMS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF FOOD PRODUCTS ALSO INCLUDING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING-- FLOWERS AND POPCORN; TELEPHONE RETAILING IN THE FIELD OF FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS, BAKERY GOODS AND OTHER GIFT PRODUCTS IN THE NATURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS SIMULATING FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS; TELEPHONE AND OTHER ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING GIFT BASKETS COMPOSED OF PRIMARILY POPCORN, GIFT BASKETS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF FLOWER ARANGEMENTS, GIFT BOXES COMPOSED OF POPCORN, GIFT BASKETS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF POPCORN DISPLAYED TO SIMULATE FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS, GIFT ITEMS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF FOOD PRODUCTS ALSO INCLUDING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING -- FLOWERS AND POPCORN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |