Drawing for BEEN THERE FIXED THAT

USPTO serial 75440177

BEEN THERE FIXED THAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEEN THERE FIXED THAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals, namely, epoxies for maintenance, protection and repair of industrial machinery and equipment; anaerobic adhesives for general industrial use; urethane, epoxy and cyanoacrylate adhesives for general industrial use; general purpose adhesives for general industrial use; epoxies for floor repair, patching and resurfacingACTIVE
003Abrasive compounds, namely, grinding and lapping compounds for finishing of hard metal surfaces in industrial applications; preparations for cleaning, galvanizing, and protecting metal surfaces; cleaning preparations for hands and tools; rust converting and removing preparationsACTIVE
004Anti-seize lubricants for industrial machinery and automotive equipment; lubricants for metal surfacesACTIVE
017Non-hardening sealant material used as a gasket sealant in industrial machinery, construction, manufacturing, and automotive applications; sealants in the form of tapes for sealing threaded joints; fast setting sealant material for threadlocking, setting, sealing, bearing, retaining and gasketing of industrial machineryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 7, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance