USPTO serial 75440990
EVERLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2881907Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
Bronx, NY
Other trademarks owned by Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY DWYER CHAPMAN
NANCY DWYER CHAPMAN LACKENBACH SEIGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries, namely, electronic and galvanic batteries | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EVERLAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |