Drawing for EVERLAST

USPTO serial 75440990

EVERLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2881907Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 7, 2004
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries, namely, electronic and galvanic batteriesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2006C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
May 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 3, 2006C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Jun 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 3, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 3, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 4, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 18, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 7, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 30, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 4, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 2, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 2, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 19, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 16, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 27, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Dec 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 31, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance