USPTO serial 75441734
COMPUTER SHOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2702780Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2003
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPUTER SHOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene M. Pak, Esq.
KATHERINE A KEATING ESQ HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP560 MISSION ST 25TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing information in the field of computer hardware and software and peripherals, computing, technology news, computer games and a world-wide computer information network and a wide range of related information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNET NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff-Davis Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ZD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZD INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COMPUTER SHOPPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |