USPTO serial 75442175
E-VIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-VIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAX MOSKOWITZ
144-15 70TH RDFLUSHING, NY 11367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voice and telephone call processing dedicated electronic device used to place and receive long distance telephone calls over global computer networks; and computer software used to place and receive long distance telephone calls over global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 1, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |