Drawing for BUFFALO BRAVES

USPTO serial 75445760

BUFFALO BRAVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUFFALO BRAVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD A FRIEDMAN

RICHARD A FRIEDMAN NBA PROPERTIES INCOLYMPIC TWR BLDG645 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, hosiery, footwear, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, tank tops, jerseys, shorts, pajamas, sport shirts, rugby shirts, sweaters, belts, ties, nightshirts, hats, warm-up suits, jackets, parkas, coats, cloth bibs, head bands, wrist bands, aprons, boxer shorts, slacks, caps, ear muffs and glovesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 14, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 14, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 9, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 26, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance