USPTO serial 75447914
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
ALMERE, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie E. Platkin
Jamie E. Platkin Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church St, 22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management and consulting services, namely, vehicle fleet management; wholesale and retail distributorship services featuring motor vehicles, trailers, forklifts, palette trucks, material handling systems, warehouse equipment, conveyor belts, hand trucks, phones and fax machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1997 |
| 036 | financing services for motor vehicles, trailers, forklifts, palette trucks, material handling systems, warehouse equipment, and agricultural equipment; [insurance underwriting,] administration,[ and brokerage services for motor vehicles;] real estate management services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1997 |
| 037 | [rental and leasing of internal transport equipment, namely, motor vehicles, trailers, forklifts, palette trucks, material handling systems, warehouse equipment and construction equipment;] maintenance and repair services for motor vehicles, trailers, forklifts, palette trucks, material handling systems, warehouse equipment and agricultural equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1997 |
| 039 | [rental and leasing of building and warehouse machinery, namely, forklifts, palette trucks, material handling systems and warehouse equipment; leasing and rental of motor vehicles and trucks trailers; motor vehicle storage services] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1997 |
| 042 | [rental and leasing of agricultural equipment; consulting services in the field of information technology and communications software development; communications software development for others] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 14, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |