USPTO serial 75449050
GROSSINGER'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROSSINGER'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M SCHWARTZ
DEBORAH TELLERMAN BERKOWITZ ESQ RUDEN MCCLOSKY SMITH SCHUSTER & RUSSELLSTE 1500, 200 E BROWARD BLVDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Rental of apartments | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1990 |
| 043 | adult and retirement community services for multi-unit commercial and residential real estate developments, namely, providing retirement community centers for social gatherings and meetings, adult congregate living facilities, providing assisted living facilities, restaurant services providing for consumption of food and drink on the premises, and providing temporary housing accommodations | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SRR MANAGEMENT CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by SRR MANAGEMENT CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Unicom Partnership, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GROSSINGER'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |