USPTO serial 75449573
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CORAL SPRINGS, FL
CORAL SPRINGS, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Barman
David W. Barman The Law Office of David W. Barman, P.A.P.O. Box 613127Miami, FL 33261UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | TEACHING PROGRAMS, NAMELY, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CLASSES, TRAINING PROGRAMS, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF MULTI-SENSORY LEARNING AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT, AND EDUCATIONAL CONSULTING RELATED THERETO; CORPORATE TRAINING PROGRAMS, NAMELY, ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF MULTI-SENSORY LEARNING AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRAINING SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF MULTI-SENSORY LEARNING AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING RECREATIONAL CAMPS; AND ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ATHLETIC TRAINING CLASSES IN THE FIELD OF MULTI-SENSORY LEARNING AND LEARNING ASSESSMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Medical testing and evaluation services in the field of vision improvement and assessment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 24, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 5, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |