USPTO serial 75450843
SUPERMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2948155Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beer Sheva 84001, IL
KFAR SABA, IL
Beer Sheva 84001, IL
M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
KFAR SABA, IL
Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
KFAR SABA, IL
M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
KFAR SABA, IL
Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Brody-Brown
Dana Brody-Brown White & Case LLP3000 El Camino Real5 Palo Alto Square, 9th FloorPalo Alto, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MODULAR ARITHMETIC PROCESSORS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC CALCULATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FORTRESS U & T LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MSYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by FORTRESS U & T LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDISK IL LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPERMAP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |