USPTO serial 75454277
DESIGN IN MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DESIGN IN MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLE F BARRETT
CAROLE F BARRETT FENWICK & W LLP100 THE EMBARCADERO STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing information about graphic design, multimedia design, and software design and development, providing information over local area networks, wide area networks and a global computer network about retrieving, managing and manipulating interactive content, providing information about computer software for creating animation, sound, graphics, presentations, and illustrations, providing information about computer software for viewing and playing animation, sound, graphics, presentations, and illustrations, providing information about computer software for use in authoring for the web, and providing information about computer software for enhancing the capabilities of web browser software, all over local area networks, wide area networks, and global computer networks | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |