Drawing for ETAS

USPTO serial 75455278

ETAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2533211Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2002
Examiner
STRIEGEL, ADAM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ETAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS WHICH INTERFACE WITH EMBEDDED AUTOMOTIVE CONTROL SOFTWARE FOR PURPOSES OF TESTING, MEASURING AND APPLICATION OF HARDWARE, BUT EXCLUDING ALL THOSE AFORESAID GOODS BEING USED IN THE FIELD OF NAVIGATION INCLUDING NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN PARTICULAR ELECTRONIC TRAVEL PILOTS AND ELECTRONIC MAPSACTIVE
041PROVIDING TRAINING IN THE USE AND APPLICATION OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS WHICH INTERFACE WITH EMBEDDED AUTOMOTIVE CONTROL SOFTWARE, BUT EXCLUDING ALL THOSE AFORESAID SERVICES BEING USED IN THE FIELD OF NAVIGATION INCLUDING NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES IN PARTICULAR ELECTRONIC TRAVEL PILOTS AND ELECTRONIC MAPSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 27, 2022NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2022RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 27, 202289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Apr 26, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 30, 2021E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 28, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 25, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 22, 2007C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 19, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Feb 2, 2007815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 10, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 10, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 10, 2001EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED
Sep 14, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 28, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 10, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance