USPTO serial 75456047
BUFFALO BILL'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUFFALO BILL'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN E REILLY
JOHN E REILLY THE REILLY IP LAW FIRM1554 EMERSON STDENVER, CO 80218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FRESH VEGETABLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Western Tortilla Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Great Western Tortilla Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BUFFALO BILL'S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |