USPTO serial 75458522
ALLERCURB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLERCURB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington Court House, OH
Washington Court House, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT G ROOMIAN
P O BOX 7111ALEXANDRIA, VA 22307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of anti-allergenic chemistry; educational research in the field of anti-allergenic chemistry; educational demonstrations in the field of anti-allergenic chemistry; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of anti-allergenic chemistry; and training in the use and operation of pesticide application equipment and cleaning equipment in the field of anti-allergenic chemistry | ACTIVE | Feb 29, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2001 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |