Drawing for GLIDETEXT

USPTO serial 75464801

GLIDETEXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLIDETEXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN R ORMISTON

P O BOX 1840BOISE, ID 83701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic text for use as a component of an electronic book, magazine, newsletter, manual, or newspaperACTIVE
016Printed text for use as a component of a book, magazine, newsletter, manual, or newspaperACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 12, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 13, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 10, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 1998AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance