USPTO serial 75465548
DESCARTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2861830Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2004
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DESCARTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Descartes Systems Group Inc., The
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Descartes Systems Group Inc., The
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Descartes Systems Group Inc., The
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina L. Brown
Christina L. Brown MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLPSUITE 3100300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer training services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting service, namely, systems configuration, software engineering, systems integration, customized software development for others, and maintenance and installation of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Descartes Systems Group Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Descartes Systems Group Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Descartes Systems Group Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DESCARTES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |