Drawing for ULTIMATETV

USPTO serial 75466327

ULTIMATETV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTIMATETV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM O. FERRON, JR.

WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software used for the transmission, delivery, and storage of television programming and television program promotions, namely, receivers, transmitters, converters, encoders, decoders, and electronic storage media, namely, computer disks, magnetic tapes, CD-ROMS, and digital disks containing information, text, audio and images, in the field of television programming and television programming promotionACTIVE
016Magazines, manuals, and reference books featuring program information relating to broadcast television, cable television, satellite television, subscription television, motion picture films, videos, musical and theatrical productions, entertainers, business information relating to the entertainment industries, and other news relating to the entertainment industries, and other news relating to the entertainment industriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 1, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 15, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 18, 2002PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2002PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Mar 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2001ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Mar 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 27, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance