USPTO serial 75467463
DESIGN PARADIGM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2847595Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2004
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DESIGN PARADIGM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Weinberg, Esq.
Steven M. Weinberg, Esq. Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books, stationery, calendars, note cards and posters; newsletters featuring information on design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |