Drawing for TRAY STACKER

USPTO serial 75468478

TRAY STACKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAY STACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TRISTRAM R FALL III

TRISTRAM R FALL III FOX ROTHSCHILD O'BRIEN & FRANKEL LLP2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016CORRUGATED PAPER CONTAINERS FOR USE IN SHIPPING GOODS IN INTERSTATE, INTRASTATE AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCEACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jun 21, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Nov 19, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance