Drawing for SEALFOAM

USPTO serial 75470727

SEALFOAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEALFOAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT H MONTGOMERY

ROBERT H MONTGOMERY ROBERT H MONTGOMERY PC36 SPORTSMAN'S HILLS RDMADISON, CT 06443UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016FOAM BOARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MOUNTING AND/OR LAMINATING PHOTOGRAPHS, GRAPHICS AND OTHER DOCUMENTSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Aug 22, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 28, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance