USPTO serial 75476697
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rhodius Qualitats-Schleifmittel GmbH & Co. KG
D-56659 Burgbrohl, DE
Other trademarks owned by Rhodius Qualitats-Schleifmittel GmbH & Co. KG
Rhodius Qualitats-Schleifmittel GmbH & Co. KG
D-56659 Burgbrohl, DE
Other trademarks owned by Rhodius Qualitats-Schleifmittel GmbH & Co. KG
RHODIUS SCHLEIFWERKZEUGE GMBH & CO. KG
BURGBROHL, DE
Other trademarks owned by RHODIUS SCHLEIFWERKZEUGE GMBH & CO. KG
Rhodius Qualitats-Schleifmittel GmbH & Co. KG
D-56659 Burgbrohl, DE
Other trademarks owned by Rhodius Qualitats-Schleifmittel GmbH & Co. KG
Burgbrohl, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa S. Dillenbeck
Melissa S. Dillenbeck Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP320 South Canal Street, Suite 3300Chicago, IL 60606United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine parts, namely power operated bonded grinding wheels; power operated bonded abrasive grinding wheels and blades; power operated diamond abrasive blades; resin bonded grinding wheels; and coated abrasive disks, sheets, rolls and belts, all used for abrading and cutting metal, concrete, and masonry | ACTIVE | May 1, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |