Drawing for MLSLISTINGS

USPTO serial 75482119

MLSLISTINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MLSLISTINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARL M DURHAM JR

CARL M DURHAM JR BERLINER COHEN10 ALMADEN BLVD 11TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035advertising and promotion database products and services for others offered in the field of real estate available on a global computer network and on individual web sites, namely-- (1) dissemination of advertising for others via an online communications network; and (2) rental of advertising space for others on a global computer network; and (3) dissemination of advertising matter for others regarding global communication network and database servicesACTIVEOct 8, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 29, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 19, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 2, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 17, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 5, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 5, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 14, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 16, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance