USPTO serial 75486591
BURNING DESIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IVEY, IAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BURNING DESIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D PETER HOCHBERG
D PETER HOCHBERG PETER HOCHBERG CO LPATHE BAKER BLDG 6TH FL1940 E 6TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | for apparel, namely, T-shirts, nightwear, namely, pajamas, bathrobes, night gowns and night shirts, underwear, ties, caps, leisure wear and sportswear, namely, tank tops, sweat shirts, sweat pants, shirts, warm-up suits, sweaters, fleece tops, footwear, overalls, hats, caps, visors, head bands, sweat bands, ear muffs, gloves, mittens, belts, socks, sweat socks, thermal socks, kerchiefs, scarves, mufflers, neckerchiefs, vests, aprons, boxer shorts, briefs, underpants, dresses, skirts, cotton woven shirts, knit shirts, polo shirts, crew neck sweaters, V-neck sweaters, turtleneck sweaters, cardigans, jeans, pants, slacks, trousers, blazers, sport coats, jackets, polyester wovenshirts, rayon woven shirts, wool woven shirts, denim shorts, and denim jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |