Drawing for COLOR IQ

USPTO serial 75487964

COLOR IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BAKER, CHRISTINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA A PIERONI

LISA A PIERONI KIRSCHSTEIN OTTINGER ISRAEL ET AL489 5TH AVE FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10017-6105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOO, SHAMPOO WITH NON-PERMANENT HAIR COLOR, CONDITIONER, CONDITIONER WITH NON-PERMANENT HAIR COLOR, POMADES, HAIR SHINE ENHANCER LOTIONS, GELS AND SERUMS, HAIR LIGHTENING AND BLEACHING PREPARATIONS, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR MOUSSE, HAIR GELS, HAIR STYLING LOTIONS, PERMANENT HAIR COLOR DYES AND PIGMENTS, PERMANENT WAVING PREPARATIONS AND HAIR RELAXERS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, MASCARA, LIPSTICK, LIP PENCILS, EYESHADOW, FOUNDATION, BLUSH, EYEBROW PENCILS, FACE POWDERS; BATH AND SHOWER SOAPS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, BODY LOTIONS, ASTRINGENTS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, FACIAL AND SKIN CLEANSERS, FACIAL MASKS, FACIAL AND BODY SCRUBS, AND FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, EAU DE TOILETTE, AND ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USEACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 13, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Apr 18, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance