USPTO serial 75490741
IN A WORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN A WORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E BROWNE
ROBERT E BROWNE ALTHEIMER & GRAY10 S WACKER DR STE 4000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | series of instructional books for instruction in vocabulary | ACTIVE | Jun 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 27, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |