USPTO serial 75490769
MGG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2694173Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2003
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MGG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75017 Paris, FR
75017 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP2300 N St., N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |