USPTO serial 75495291
STERIBOTTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STERIBOTTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN P HOFFMAN
MARTIN P HOFFMAN HOFFMAN WASSON & GITLER PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHRISTOPHER MALLET and NICHOLAS SALAMAN
- Other trademarks owned by STERIBOTTLE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by STERIBOTTLE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named STERIBOTTLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |