CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INTERLAKE

USPTO serial 75497651

INTERLAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2584184Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 25, 2002
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INTERLAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Ward

Robert J. Ward Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP1601 Elm Street Suite 3000Dallas, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PAPER TOWELS; PAPER NAPKINS; [ PAPER BAGS AND PAPER BOXES FOR PACKAGING BY THE FOOD INDUSTRY; ] FILTER PAPER; DISPOSABLE PAPER WIPERS NOT IMPREGNATED WITH CHEMICALS OR COMPOUNDSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 12, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 24, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 21, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 28, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 25, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance