USPTO serial 75499978
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A DEGRANDI
JOSEPH A DEGRANDI BEVERIDGE DEGRANDI WEILACHER & YOUNG1850 M ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital keypads cordless telephones, telephones, fax machines, modems, answering machines, answering machines with message recording capability, telephone apparatus, namely, intercoms, telephone exchange, namely, automatic dialers, electronic exchanges, radio telephones, wireless pagers, memory-based telephone dialers, namely, automatic telephone dialers, digital-to-analog converters, analog-to digital converters, optical fibers signal receivers, namely, telephone, audio, video, optical fiber signal regenerators, namely, telephone, audio, video, radio junction transmitters, radio junction receivers, coding devices, telephone line circuit connector boxes, remote controls for, radios, televisions, and stereos | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |