Drawing for RAILWELD

USPTO serial 75502796

RAILWELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSAYA, LISA W.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAILWELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT V VICKERS

ROBERT V VICKERS VICKERS DANIELS & YOUNG50 PUBLIC SQ STE 2000CLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ARC WELDING ELECTRODESACTIVEMay 6, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 4, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 28, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 15, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 30, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance