Drawing for FITTING PROMISE

USPTO serial 75503362

FITTING PROMISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FITTING PROMISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERARD F DUNNE

156 5TH AVE STE 1223NEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025hosieryACTIVEJul 18, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 29, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 29, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 7, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 19, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Aug 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 11, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 28, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance