USPTO serial 75514045
CLEAN VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2002
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEAN VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 3R3, CA
Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 3R3, CA
Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 3R3, CA
Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE K WADE
STEPHANIE K WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | CLEANING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, UPRIGHT BROOMS, PUSH BROOMS, COUNTER BRUSHES, KITCHEN BRUSHES, SCRUB BRUSHES, WASHROOM BRUSHES, WET MOPS, DISH MOPS, DUST MOPS AND DUST PANS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Atlas-Graham Industries Company Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CLEAN VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |