USPTO serial 75519902
MICRO-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRO-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Wenger
PATRICIA A WENGER JOHN LEZDEY & ASSOCIATES1018 LAUREL OAK RD STE 4VOORHEES, NJ 08043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Catheter shafts having a PTFE liner, variable pick braid reinforcement and a smooth copolymer outer jacket for use in local drug delivery, energy source delivery, mechanical, revascularization, diagnostic, and stent | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |