USPTO serial 75520818
SUPER SHAKES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPER SHAKES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PORT CHARLOTTE, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SERVICES OF HOTEL FOR OTHERS; RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERS; RESTAURANTS; CAFETERIAS; TEA-ROOMS; BAR SERVICES; CONVALESCENT AND REST HOMES; NURSERIES AND DAY CARE CENTERS; ESCORT SERVICES; DATING SERVICES; BEAUTY AND HAIRDRESSING SALONS; MAKING HOTEL RESERVATIONS FOR OTHERS; ENGINEERING; MATERIAL TESTING; PRINTING SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE NATURE OF A COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARD IN THE FIELD OF CATERING AND HOSTELRY; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF CATERING AND HOSTELRY; PROVIDING CONVENTION FACILITIES (GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITY, NOT A SPACE DEVOTED TO A SINGLE TYPE OF EXHIBITION); AND LEASING OF BED CLOTHES, NAMELY LINENS, PILLOWS, AND COVERS FOR HOTELS AND MOTELS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |