USPTO serial 75521155
XTREME PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTREME PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE M THOMAS
GEORGE M THOMAS THOMAS KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1500ATLANTA, GA 30339-5948UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | physical fitness services and related facilities featuring obstacle courses, wall climbing courses, arranging and conducting court games, physical fitness team building instruction, arranging and conducting parties, arranging and conducting social and athletic events, providing teenage music entertainment, entertainment event and dance organization, broadcasting live and pre-recorded programming, amusement arcades, food services related to the physical fitness services and facilities, and retail clothing sales related to the physical fitness services and facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |