USPTO serial 75523309
FRAMEWORX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRAMEWORX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS (CANADA), INC.
EDMONTON ALBERTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS (CANADA), INC.
Taylor Industrial Software Inc.
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2X5, CA
TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS (CANADA), INC.
EDMONTON ALBERTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS (CANADA), INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J DEVENNY
JOHN J DEVENNY GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06431-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE BASED COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CONTROLLING MACHINES IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, INSTALLATION, CONSULTING, DEBUGGING, UPDATING, UPGRADING AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE BASED COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CONTROLLING MACHINES IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS (CANADA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Taylor Industrial Software Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS (CANADA), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRAMEWORX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |