USPTO serial 75524764
AUDIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT DELIVERS VIEWERS DIRECTLY TO THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS FOR PARTICIPATION IN 0N-LINE EVENTS VIA NOTIFICATION SYSTEM; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MEASURING VIEWER PARTICIPATION BY RETAINING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE VISITORS TO THE WEB SITES | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 1998 |
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING MULTIMEDIA PROMOTIONS FOR THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS, AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PREPARING AND PLACING MULTIMEDIA, RELATED INFORMATION, NAMELY, METADATA, AND PROMOTIONS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SUCH MULTIMEDIA, RELATED INFORMATION AND PROMOTIONS BY RETAINING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE VISITORS TO THE WEB SITES, ALL RENDERED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |