USPTO serial 75527923
BOO BOO CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BOO BOO CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carrithers
David W. Carrithers CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE, PLLC120 W. Stephen Foster Ave, Suite 101Bardstown, KY 40004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Topical wound healing agent in the form of a cream for skin wounds, insect bites and other skin irritations | ACTIVE | Mar 14, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |