USPTO serial 75530715
FINANCIAL INSIDER NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FINANCIAL INSIDER NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUGENE J RUDNIK JR
EUGENE J RUDNIK JR KEMP & GRZELAKOWSKI LTD1900 SPRING RD STE 500OAK BROOK, IL 60523-1495UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CONSUMER CREDIT REPORTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |