Drawing for VISUAL INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75531522

VISUAL INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, LAURIEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUAL INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary B. Scott

MARY B SCOTT GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for analyzing video images of human behavior and use of this information to steer and control programs or hardwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 6, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 6, 2000EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Jun 26, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 23, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 23, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 10, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance