USPTO serial 75535242
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B. MURPHY
DAVID B MURPHY O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP114 PACIFICA STE 100IRVINE, CA 90071-2066UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personnel placement and recruitment services; business networking services; market analysis services; providing facilities for business meetings between buyers and sellers; computer services for others, namely, information storage, retrieval, and processing in the field of commercial transactions; computer services for others, namely, information storage, retrieval, and processing in the field of general consumer goods and services; brokerage services, namely, acting as an agent to match sales leads with potential buyers, and to match purchase requests with potential sellers, all in the field of general consumer goods and services; business merchandising display services in the field of on-line consumer goods and services; product merchandising in the field of on-line consumer goods and services; and retail and wholesale shop-by-telephone or shop-by-video mail order services in the field of general consumer goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing, and for the transmission of video conferences | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment, namely a continuing game show distributed over a communications network, namely, over television, telephone, and computer networks; providing facilities for game shows; and providing facilities for educational for educational conventions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services, namely, professional and nonprofessional career counseling services; medical services; technical supervision and inspections in the field of product quality control; security surveillance services, namely, monitoring of security systems; providing facilities for conventions; dating services, video dating services, and providing facilities relating to video dating services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |