USPTO serial 75535688
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Memory book and scrapbook materials, namely, memory albums, photograph albums, scrapbook albums, binders, leaf binders, envelopes, filler paper for albums and binders, plastic pages for holding sheets of paper, plastic pages for holding photographs, archival storage pages, and paper expanding files | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |