Drawing for GENERATIONS

USPTO serial 75535688

GENERATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DONNELL, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENERATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Memory book and scrapbook materials, namely, memory albums, photograph albums, scrapbook albums, binders, leaf binders, envelopes, filler paper for albums and binders, plastic pages for holding sheets of paper, plastic pages for holding photographs, archival storage pages, and paper expanding filesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 12, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 31, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 4, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 2, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Aug 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 21, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 10, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 7, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jul 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 14, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 16, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 16, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 4, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance