USPTO serial 75535988
OPENIPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENIPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that is downloadable from a remote computer site or that is otherwise provided by CD-ROM, diskette or other storage media, for use in (1) accessing a securities offering auction system, (2) utilizing underwriter and auction advisor services; and (3) accessing information services relating to news, business, finance, securities and securities markets and models that objectively rate securities by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |