USPTO serial 75537127
RX.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RX.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL S METTEAUER
MICHAEL S METTEAUER FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | on-line retail pharmacy services; Drug prescription fulfillment services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |