USPTO serial 75537866
LIFE-FLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFE-FLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAND AND BODY CREAMS, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS, NON-MEDICATED SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONERS, BODY OIL FOR PERSONAL USE | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
| 005 | DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, HAND AND BODY THERAPEUTIC CREAMS, HAND AND BODY THERAPEUTIC LOTIONS, MEDICATED SHAMPOO, LIQUID MINERALS, VITAMINS, NATURAL PROGESTERONE CREAM, TEST KIT COMPRISING OF A COLLECTION RECEPTABLE FOR SALIVA TO PERFORM AN ASSAY EVALUATION OF HORMONE LEVELS, THERAPEUTIC TRANSDERMAL CREAMS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR USE AS A DIETARY SUPPLEMENT; HERBAL EXTRACTS FOR USE AS A DIETARY SUPPLEMENT, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |