USPTO serial 75537891
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |