Drawing for AMERA WILDFLOWER RIZK

USPTO serial 75537891

AMERA WILDFLOWER RIZK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERA WILDFLOWER RIZK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MODELING FOR ADVERTISING OR SALESACTIVEApr 11, 1990
041ENTERTAINMENT-- MUSIC, DRAMA AND MODELING FOR ARTISTSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 25, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 25, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 18, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Sep 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 31, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 9, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2001PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED
Mar 5, 2001PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 2, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance